Cooling tray performance gets ignored until roast back-to-back speed increases
B
tiga minggu yang lalu
My confusion with cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting is that the idea makes sense on paper, but practical execution looks much less clean. The more I ask around, the more I hear opposite conclusions from people who are all experienced. That usually means the answer depends on context more than people admit.
For members here who have worked with cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting, what condition makes it useful and what condition makes it mostly noise?
5 Replies
M
tiga minggu yang lalu
I disagree a little with people who say cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting is only a small detail. Small detail alone maybe yes, but several small details together can move the cup a lot.
A
tiga minggu yang lalu
i see cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting work in some place, but usually only when the notes are clear and people really compare batch by batch. if not, discussion become only feeling.
W
tiga minggu yang lalu
For cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting, I only trust conclusion after I see same pattern several times. One successful run can be accident. Repetition is what make the lesson useful.
N
tiga minggu yang lalu
I think the bigger issue is not cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting itself but whether your baseline is stable. If baseline keeps moving, then every experiment around it gives mixed signal.
S
tiga minggu yang lalu
From my side this helped only on certain coffees, not on every lot. When the coffee is already forgiving, cooling tray performance during back-to-back roasting does not change much. On difficult lots the effect is clearer.
Enter your forum email. ERP-linked and Google-linked accounts will show a notice. Manual forum accounts will receive an OTP email to reset the password.