Mold- Free Coffee is real certificate or just marketing claim? | Processing & Quality Forum | Clorofile
Clorofile Processing & Quality
Processing & Quality

Mold- Free Coffee is real certificate or just marketing claim?

D
satu minggu yang lalu
so lately I've seen labels or claims of 'mold-free coffee' from some premium brand, especially outside brands whose target is heath-conscious market. At first I thought it was just marketing. But the more I got here, the more curious it was or not?

What I found after I started the research: There are two major toxins that are concering: Ochratoxin A (OTA) and Aflatoxin B1. Aflatoxin B1 is classified IARC as carcinogen group 1, so this is not something to ignore.

The problem I see: there is no universal standard of WTO, SCA, or any international agency that defines legally what 'mold-free coffee' is a category. Which means the brand that claims these can use different threads. There are EU boundaries, there are tighter ones.

My question: Is there a certificate body that recognized that could validate this claim? Or is the wild west still here?
6 Replies
M
satu minggu yang lalu
you're on the right track. This is a gray area. OTA testing and aflatoxin need a lab specialized, not something to do in the field. A lab that can test in Indonesia is there but not much and the cost per sample is not cheap. The realistic one for the majority producer: focus on the minimal protocol of the growth conditions of the fungus, which is the correct drying, the late Zmoisture content at Zgreen bean does not exceed 11.12%, and the proper storage.
B
satu minggu yang lalu
from the regulatory obedience side, the most rigorous currently indeed EU with EC 472 / 2012. The exporter who wants to enter the EU market consistently should be able to provide the certificate of analysis for their lot. The tests were performed by lab accredited. if you want a legal 'mold-free' claim being exported, test based on EU limits is de facto benchmark even though there are no official global standards.
B
satu minggu yang lalu
i once protested to one of these brands who claimed this to his record salesman, asking: tested by which lab, what threshold, which kind of specific lot? It's a red flag for gw. If these claims are genuine, there should be a COA to share.
S
satu minggu yang lalu
that's a valid question and a sophisticated buyer did start asking for stuff like that. The trend towards more transparency in this quality document has already begun, especially from buyers in Europe and Japan. Seriously buyer asking for COA and tracebility documentation, not just stories on labels.
A
satu minggu yang lalu
from the farmer's side, the correct drying condition was the most critical step to minimize mycotoxin risk. Slow-drying coffee due to weather or inadequate facilities, or stored in humid conditions, it's a much higher risk. It's not just testing it's about good practice along the supply chain from cherry to Zgreen bean.
N
satu minggu yang lalu
it makes me more aware to always ask the suppliers about the green bean storage conditions. I've been buying and buying and never thinking about it. Thank you for picking up.

Write a Reply

Login first to reply.

Report Thread

Sign in first if you want to report this thread to the moderator team.

Create New Post

Silakan login terlebih dahulu untuk membuat post.

Unsaved Writing

You have unsaved writing. Save it as a draft before closing?

Member Info

Loading member info...

Sign In to Clorofile Forum